-
Risk Advisory
Security for your business
-
Digital advisory & IT consulting
Mastering digitalisation together
-
Operational Advisory
Solidifying and supporting transformation
-
Deal Advisory
We’ll advise you on national and international transactions
-
Valuation & economic and dispute advisory
We’ll value your business fairly and realistically
-
Financial Advisory
Optimising financial structures
-
Tax for businesses
Because your business – national or international – deserves better tax advice.
-
Tax for financial institutions
Financial services tax – for banks, asset managers and insurance companies
-
Employment law
Representation for businesses
-
Commercial & distribution
Making purchasing and distribution legally water-tight.
-
Inheritance and succession
Don’t leave the future to chance.
-
Financial Services | Legal
Your Growth, Our Commitment.
-
Business legal
Doing business successfully by optimally structuring companies
-
Real estate law
We cover everything on the real estate sector, the hotel industry, and the law governing construction and architects, condominium ownership, and letting and renting.
-
IT, IP and data protection
IT security and digital innovations
-
Mergers & acquisitions (M&A)
Your one-stop service provider focusing on M&A transactions
-
Sustainability strategy
Laying the cornerstone for sustainability.
-
Sustainability management
Managing the change to sustainability.
-
Sustainability reporting
Communicating sustainability performance and ensuring compliance.
-
Sustainable finance
Integrating sustainability into investment decisions.
-
International business
Our country expertise
-
Entering the German market
Your reliable partners.
The case
W is a stock corporation headquartered and located in Germany. In August 2004, W opened a branch in the United Kingdom and decided to close it in 2007. Due to the closure, the tax losses of the branch in the UK could no longer be carried forward. W claimed that the aforementioned losses of its branch should be taken into account as final losses for "Union law reasons" when determining its taxable income in Germany for the 2007 assessment period. However, income of the branch is not taxable in Germany under the double taxation agreement (“DTA”) and the tax office in Germany refused to take the losses into account. W filed a lawsuit against it.
The German Federal Financial Court has referred the matter to the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) for a preliminary ruling because, in its view, with regard to the divergent ECJ rulings Timac Agro (ruling of December 17, 2015, C-388/14) and Bevola/Trock (ruling of June 12, 2018, C-650/16), the treatment of losses in the case of a DTA exemption of the results of permanent establishments in other Member States has not yet been sufficiently clarified.
Jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice
On September 22, 2022 the ECJ ruled that Articles 49 and 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding a tax regime of a Member State under which a company resident there cannot deduct its final losses from the taxable profits of a company resident in another Member State if the State of residence has waived its right to tax the income under a DTA. According to the ECJ the ruling does not contradict the judgment of Bevola/Trock because Denmark had unilaterally waived its power to exert its taxing rights over the profits and losses incurred in another member state.